By Tony Winterburn • Published: 01 May 2020 • 13:37
THE Duchess of Sussex claims journalists at the Mail on Sunday and its sister titles waged a campaign of deceit and dishonesty against her.
However, the newspapers’ lawyers claimed her allegations belonged in a defamation case, not a privacy one.
Judge Mark Warby ruled in favour of the tabloid. His judgement reads: “It is right as a matter of discretion to strike the allegations out; they are not minor matters but serious allegations of wrongdoing.”
The case is fundamentally about privacy but also contains allegations by the Duchess of Sussex, 38, that Daily Mail journalists tried to discredit her using “offensive” and “divisive” stories.
These claims of “impropriety and bad faith” were challenged by the publisher’s lawyers last week during a strike-out hearing. They argued such attacks belonged in a libel trial, not a privacy one, and asked the judge to rule on whether they should be stricken from the case.
The case continues…
Share this story
Subscribe to our Euro Weekly News alerts to get the latest stories into your inbox!
By signing up, you will create a Euro Weekly News account if you don't already have one. Review our Privacy Policy for more information about our privacy practices.
Share your story with us by emailing newsdesk@euroweeklynews.com, by calling +34 951 38 61 61 or by messaging our Facebook page www.facebook.com/EuroWeeklyNews
By signing up, you will create a Euro Weekly News account if you don’t already have one. Review our Privacy Policy for more information about our privacy practices.
Download our media pack in either English or Spanish.