Today, Monday, 6 December, it was found that Boris Johnson did not ‘misdirect’ over Ministerial Code in the Priti Patel bullying case last year.
The FDA union, which represents senior public servants, brought a judicial review over the Prime Minister’s decision last year to back the home secretary following allegations of bullying.
Lawyers for the union sought a declaration Mr Johnson had “misinterpreted” the term “bullying” as covered by paragraph 1.2 of the code, arguing he made a “misdirection of law” when reaching his decision.
In a ruling released on Monday, Lord Justice Lewis, sitting with Mrs Justice Steyn, dismissed the FDA’s claim.
The judge said: “The question for this court is whether the Prime Minister proceeded on the basis that conduct would not fall within the description of bullying within paragraph 1.2 of the Ministerial Code if the person concerned was unaware of, or did not intend, the harm or offence caused.
“Reading the statement [made by Mr Johnson] as a whole, and in context, we do not consider that the Prime Minister misdirected himself in that way.”
He highlighted judges “had not been provided with the details of the allegations made against Ms Patel”, but said “the court had not been asked to express a view on whether she did the things alleged nor what sanctions, if any, would be appropriate.”
In an investigation into Priti Patel’s behaviour, Sir Laex Allan concluded: “Her approach on occasions has amounted to behaviour that can be described as bullying in terms of the impact felt by individuals. To that extent her behaviour has been in breach of the Ministerial Code, even if unintentionally.”
In Monday’s judgment, Lord Justice Lewis said: “Viewing the statement as a whole and in context, the Prime Minister either accepted that aspects of the conduct of the home secretary could be described as bullying, or, at least, did not form a concluded view on that question.
“The statement did not expressly state any disagreement with what Sir Alex is recorded as having found, that is that her approach on occasions could be described as bullying.”
He added: “The statement that the Prime Minister’s judgment was that the ministerial code was not breached is not therefore a finding that the conduct could not be described as bullying.
“Rather, it is either a statement that the Prime Minister does not consider, looking at all the factors involved, that it would be right to record that the ministerial code had been breached, or alternatively, that the conduct did not in all the circumstances warrant a sanction such as a dismissal as it did not cause the Prime Minister to lose confidence in the minister.”
Thank you for taking the time to read this article, do remember to come back and check The Euro Weekly News website for all your up-to-date local and international news stories and remember, you can also follow us on Facebook and Instagram.