ECJ decision opens door to claim against banks

0
Photo: Scott Maxwell
Claim in court for the mortgage floor clause

ECJ decision opens door to claim against banks even if you have signed an agreement to waive future actions over floor clause.

THE decision of July 9, 2020, by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the case C452 / 18 has recently been published and opens the possibility to claim in court for the mortgage floor clause, even if some form of amended agreement has been reached with the Bank. 

As many of you will know, when the banks began to lose the mortgage floor rates court cases and solid court precedents began to be established, the banks began to contact their clients, offering to change their mortgage loans to fixed-rate ones, or even lowering the floor clause, or the minimum interest to pay.  

-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Many of these agreements were signed without the advice of a Spanish Lawyer and a number of bank clients, who were not legally advised, were not even aware that they had a floor clause or the thousands of euros that it cost them. 

In these contracts (novations or modifications of existing mortgage loans), worded as novation contracts or out-of-court agreements, banks required their clients to renounce the right to take further legal action after signing the agreement. 

What the ECJ says in this judgment, which is significant because it differs from what was stated by the Spanish Supreme Court, is that: 


  1. It is possible that a null clause (mortgage floor) may be renewed and modified by means of an agreement between the consumer and a bank, only as long as the consumer knew that the clause was null and non-binding and that he freely entered into it and informedly consented its modification. 
  1. The clauses themselves contained in floor clause modification agreement could be considered abusive, if they are not transparent and have been imposed by the bank. 
  1. In the case of waivers of legal actions that were contained in these agreements, to determine if they are valid, the information provided by the bank must be considered as well as its consequences and must be a waiver on an existing dispute only. 
  1. The CJEU points out that the waivers of legal actions related to future disagreements are simply abusive and do not bind the consumer. 

Therefore, if you were affected by a mortgage floor clause rate, and signed an agreement with your bank, to modify your mortgage loan and convert it into a fixed-rate loan, or to lower the floor clause, and in the same agreement, you renounced the right to make any later claim against the bank, then in accordance with this ECJ court ruling, you have additional rights. 

This means that you could claim for the cancellation of the floor clause and the money overpaid, provided that you can prove that the agreement you reached with the bank is abusive because it is not transparent, and if it was not explained to you that the floor clause could be abusive and not applicable, or the legal consequences of the waiver of legal actions, etc. 

If this is your case, and you want to claim for your mortgage floor clause, even if you have signed an agreement with your bank, contact us (www.white-baos.com) and we will help you. 


The information provided in this article is not intended to be legal advice, it merely conveys information related to legal issues. 

LEAVE A COMMENT

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here